Ink dating cross cross-examination

Ink dating is an extremely challenging issue − probably one of the most complicated tasks that forensic examiners are often faced with. There are generally three different approaches that can be applied to establish the date of deposition of an ink entry on a questioned document. interactions, further studies, as well as implementation of statistical methods for more objective examination of crossed ink . lines, are necessary. Key words.

The second ink dating approach analyzes the chemical composition of inks on a contested document with the aim to determine whether these inks (as well as other materials used to produce the document – paper, inkjet printing ink , toner, stamp pad ink , etc.) were commercially available on or prior to the date appearing on the document. For example, if the questioned document’s date precedes the manufacturing date for the ink used to sign the document, it is established that the document could not have been signed on the date it bears. 3. Ink Comparison Approach. Writing ink sequencing – Examining intersections (areas where two or more pen lines cross ) to determine the order of writing (it may prove that a particular entry was added at a later time).

Ink Dating Examination and Ink Dating Expert Witness Erich Speckin Forensics. We also provide DNA Forensics, Ink Dating , Computer Cell Phone Forensics. Ink dating – chemical tag: The detection of a chemical date tag can disclose the exact year that the ink being examined was manufactured.

Cross — examination is the legal process of interrogating a witness that has been called to testify by the opposing party in a legal proceeding. When a party calls a witness to testify in court, he must follow certain rules in questioning the witness. This is called “direct examination.” Once this questioning is finished, the opposing party is given an opportunity to question the same witness, in a procedure known as “ cross — examination .” The questions asked on cross — examination are limited to those subjects discussed, asked, or answered during direct examinations of the witness. An effective cro

Successful cross examinations capture the attention of the jury and judge and expose the holes in the other side’s case. A good cross examiner uses leading questions to elicit the desired response from the witness and advance the case in a positive direction. Steps. Ask your questions at the deposition. Have the entire cross examination plan ready to go by the date of the deposition, so you can see how the witness will respond. Consider it a test run to determine whether your plan is going to work. After the deposition, edit the plan to streamline it for the date of the actual cross examination .[3] X Research source. If you don’t like an answer that was given, you can decide to omit that question at the trial. You should only ask questions with answers that are favorable to your case.

Deciding it was the latter, I spent the last l0 years of my plaintiff's practice learning everything I could about the cross examination of a psychiatric witness. In so doing, my practice changed such that now I don't handle cases directly, but am retained by attorneys to take the depositions and trial examination of their psychiatric and neuropsychological witnesses. This makes it easier to share with other attorneys and is excellent for creating questions for cross examination because word searching capabilities in a digital document speed up the process. Never releases a copy of the transcript to the defense attorney. Seal the document and advise opposing attorney you are having the ink dated at the lab of your choice. Some labs can tell you if ink is 2 years to 6 months old.

Cross — examination is a crucial part of any trial. Klein & Wilson offers unique experience in this area. Call our office to learn more: 949-478-0521. Every cross — examination should be planned. There are a handful of lawyers who are so gifted, they can make up cross — examination as they go. More likely than not, you are not one of these lawyers. For example, a witness who previously made mistakes regarding dates , times, and places may be attempting to tell the truth, but there is a question as to whether the witness can accurately testify to events. In this type of approach, the intent is not to show the witness is lying but that the witness cannot be counted upon to testify accurately to what occurred.

Perfecting cross — examination is an elusive goal. It is all but impossible to control every witness you face. Once the rules become a part of you, however, cross becomes instinctive, and you will win more cases out of the mouths of adverse witnesses than you ever dreamt possible. Many fundamentals of cross — examination are anything but secret. In fact, whenever I attend or participate in a CLE lecture on cross — examination , I am struck by the universality of the rules, no matter how they are put. They work in civil cases and criminal prosecutions. They work for the plaintiffs’ lawyers, prosecutor

Examination in chief, Cross — examination , and Re-examination are the three ways to examine a witness. The Indian Evidence Act, 1872, prescribes examination of witnesses in civil and criminal cases. In civil cases, the plaintiff has the right to begin (O.XVIII, R.3), the prosecutor or complainant begins matters in a criminal case. 5) Non-appearance of the counsel on the date fixed doesn’t prevent the party from recalling the witness for cross — examination . 6) Failure to present a witness for cross — examination after examination in chief will deprive the credibility of his evidence. 7) The court has the power to put questions to a witness if he is confused during cross — examination .

Cross — examination questions should be brief and to the point. Taking small bites at the issues is the best approach so as to further control the possible answers. For example, where the issue in a financial case is the precipitous drop in income when the husband filed his divorce, how should the questions be phrased? Cross — examination gives you an opportunity to challenge their version of the facts and to bring out other evidence that might call their claims into question. It gives you the opportunity to challenge their credibility and to bring out your truth rather than theirs. It provides you with the opportunity to tell your story in your words, with the adverse witness agreeing or disagreeing with your statements.

Comments