The dating of revelation

Dating the Book of Revelation . There is considerable disagreement among students of Revelation as to when it was written. This study is being researched and written in an effort to try and bring to light the evidence which is available to help in the dating of this book. It is this Bible Student's belief that Revelation was written by John after the destruction of Jerusalem, during the reign of Emperor Vespasian and that it refers chiefly to the great Roman persecution of the church which occurred after the destruction of Jerusalem. Many well meaning people try to approach this subject with pr

If Revelation is inadvertently dated after the events it prophesies as future, the way is opened to a radical misconstruing of its message. Indeed, not only has the message been misread in such circumstances, but it has been wholly inverted, placing in our future what really lies in our past. Hence, the significance of the date of Revelation ." more. flag 2 likes · Like · see review. Jun 09, 2020 Terry Wildman rated it it was amazing · review of another edition. Shelves: eschatology. When it comes to the book of Revelation and it's date of composition, this book is the cat's meow. It has been incredibly helpful to me. I really like Gentry.

The dating of the Book of Revelation cannot be Post A.D 70 in light of these evidences. Click to expand This assumes, however, that the apocalyptic must be talking about the physical earthly temple and not the saints, the new temple in Christ. The key, i think, is that in the idealist approach of Revelation John is revealing the nature of the persecutions the church will face and yet it isn't limited to just one "destruction" but pictures what will take place throughout the millenial age. That is why part of the temple was measured out, signifying that the the church will never be morally corrupted, but the outer parts of the temple are unmeasured, the gentiles, the beast(s) and dragon, will have dominion to persecute us and trample us under foot.

We date the book of Revelation some time during the end of the reign of Emperor Domitian (AD 95). There is both internal and external evidence for the dating of the book of Revelation : (1) External evidence. External evidence is the attestation for the date of Revelation that exists outside of the book. Several lines of argument can be offered for the late date of Revelation : Irenaeus (AD 120-200). Irenaeus is important to the dating of Revelation for two reasons: (1) he was in Smyrna during his youth where Revelation circulated, and (2) he was the disciple of Polycarp (bishop of Smyrna), who

Why is the dating of Revelation so important? Because it sets up what approach or view one will take-which of the four. Unlike letters today, the book of Revelation does not come to us postmarked with a date , so scholars and researchers need to make a reasonable assumption about the date of this book from Why is the dating of Revelation so important? Because it sets up what approach or view one will take-which of the four. Two of them, the Preterist and Futurist views, are predominately hinged on it. Unlike letters today, the book of Revelation does not come to us postmarked with a date , so

The message of Revelation beckons us away from angst and worry. It bids us to gaze upon the slain Lamb—to worship him with loyalty, devotion, and commitment. Let’s make Christ our focus, not endless speculations that, at the end of the day, have very little to do with the message of Revelation . *Correction: An earlier version of this post stated that the Senate had a bill before it, when it is the House of Representatives. Comments? Even taking into account Warden’s cautions about overplaying Domitian’s claims to divinity with respect to the dating of Revelation , his conclusions are still insightful. See also Keener, Revelation , 37. Wilson, “The Early Christians,” 185. See how the values work in Wilson, “The Early Christians,” 184.

It proves this early date for Revelation by providing both internal evidence from within Revelation and external evidence from Church history and tradition. It provides much exposition of the text of Revelation . A large part of the argument deals with the identity of the beast (666) as Nero Caesar, the first imperial persecutor of the Church. Read more.

The interpretive turn of Revelation depends strongly upon its date , so much so that the date of the book has implications as serious within Christianity as the date of the Gospels has outside of Christianity. Having looked closely at the dates of the Gospels we have already laid some groundwork in terms of what is to be considered. At the same time, if the works of Tacitus are found referred to in other documents, this may be taken as evidence for the date of Tacitus' works, in accordance with the dates of the works quoted. (Absence of such quotes would not necessarily prove a later date , but it would add suspicions if other reasons to be suspicious were present.)

And the dating of Revelation is not a theoretical assumption, but is based on exegetical evidence. There are two basic positions on the dating of Revelation , although each has several slight variations. The current majority position is the late- date view. This view holds that the Apostle John wrote Revelation toward the close of the reign of Domitian Caesar — about A.D. 95 or 96. The minority view-point today is the early- date position. Early- date advocates hold that Revelation was written by John prior to the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple in A.D. 70. I hold that Revelation was produ

Dating the authorship of revelation . It would be remiss of any serious student of Revelation not to at least do a cursory examination of the historical context to which Revelation is back-dropped. The first point of reference would have to be to determine when Revelation was written. Most scholars regard there being only two possible dates . Dr. Leon Morris explores this adequately in his Tyndale Commentary series volume on Revelation , and I recommend that this widely available commentary be read. In the case of most books of the Bible, determining the date of its authorship, while certainly im